The importance of economic and technological factors in deciding the outcome of the second world war

Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues. Within this essay it is understood to mean the ways in which wars were fought. Furthermore, one must also consider the non technological factors that affected the nature of warfare, and the ways in which wars were fought as a result of their impact.

The importance of economic and technological factors in deciding the outcome of the second world war

Hire Writer For example, during the American Civil war it is clear that the dominance of defensive weaponry made battles Inconclusive, prolonging the fighting as neither side had weaponry that decisively dominated the other. There Is evidence that Illustrates how new technology could determine the outcome of battles.

The importance of economic and technological factors in deciding the outcome of the second world war

For example, the development of the Maxim machine gun proved vital in the Battle of Motorman, where the use of it resulted in the death of 11, Sudanese, and the victory of Britain. Furthermore, the development of an effective transport system in the Franco-Prussian war enabled Mole to transport great numbers of troops to different locations where needed.

This efficient and Innovative system secured victory for the Prussian as they were able to outnumber French forces. In regards to the first half of the 20th Century, the main technological advances included heavy artillery and machine guns. In contrast to the 18th Century where advancements in defensive weaponry resulted in less intensive fighting, the development of these lethal weapons lead to long ferocious battles, as near Invincible technology ruled out any possibility AT clavicles outcomes; wars AT ten 2 Century were typically wars of attrition.

As well as affecting the intensity and length of wars, modern technology changed the structure of the forces as advancement in weaponry led to specializing within the armies and the scale of the conflicts in World War I and World War II demanded mass conscripts in order to sustain warfare.

Specialization had not been necessary in the past, however technological innovations made it necessary in order to effectively respond to different forms of attack, for instance, the use of fighter lanes in World War II made pilots essential.

This contrasted to the armies of the past that primarily consisted of infantry men and the cavalry. This is illustrated through The Blitz of where the consecutive bombings between September and May resulted in the death of over 43, civilians.

This series of bombings was orchestrated in order to destroy civilian and overpayment morale.

The importance of economic and technological factors in deciding the outcome of the second world war

The second half of the 20th Century saw the development of nuclear weapons, Jet fighters and helicopters. The significance of nuclear weapons is illustrated in the Vietnam War, where the Americans, who were in possession of such weapons, posed a huge threat to the Vietnamese who lacked them.

This drawback lead the latter to instigate guerrilla warfare, as it was the only possible way to oppose the Americans. This war demonstrates how the development of such destructive nuclear weapons lead to unconventional types of warfare.

Irregular warfare due to advanced genealogy also had a huge impact on structure and organization of forces. For example, in the Soviet war against Afghanistan, the occupation of the Soviets in major urban centers antagonized the civilians, and subsequently provoked uprisings.

For example the Munched launched relentless ambushes and raids on the Soviets, keeping their initiative through offensive action.

This type of fighting also affected the civilians, who were frequently targeted by the Soviets due to their support of the Munched. While it is evident that advances in technology did influence the nature of 19th Century warfare, other factors also had an impact.

Traces of Evil: Past IBDP History Paper 2 Questions and Responses

For example the fact that the Union had five times the number of factories than the Confederacy meant it was able to produce much more weaponry, giving them the upper hand. However, it is also argued that it was the competent leadership of Grant and Sherman that entailed success Tort ten Norton.

The influence of further non- technological factors can be seen in the Prussian War, a war which demonstrates the importance of organization and leadership.

For example, the fact that the commander of the Prussian forces, Molted, realized that in order to effectively fight the French an efficient transportation system was essential, they were able to orchestrate the manipulation of up totroops within as little as 4 weeks.

This could not have been achieved without great organization. Furthermore the morale of the soldiers clearly influenced the nature of the fighting as their performance in combat relied evilly on their motivation.

For example, in the Crimean War, British morale was destroyed by the casualties to sickness. There is evidence that suggests other factors outweighed technology in influencing the nature of early 20th Century warfare.

For example, leadership and tactics could evidently determine the outcome of battles, as illustrated in World War 1, where assaults on well defended trenches ordered by the commanders resulted in massacres. An example of this is the offensive at Uneven Chapel in 5, which failed due to the fact that High did not appreciate the importance of artillery in mamba.

Furthermore, the influence of the commanders is explicitly highlighted through the fact that the use of new tactics essentially ended World War 1. For example, the Battle of Amines in is widely agreed to have been the turning point in the war, due to the fact that as opposed to bombarding the opposition, heavy emphasis was instead placed on the element of surprise.

The success of this strategic innovation broke the German morale, as 29, Germans ere captured, but also hugely motivated the British to continue fighting. This single battle illustrates how strategy, tactics, and will to win can be vitally important in influencing the outcome.The immediate purpose of the World Bank was to finance European reconstruction following the Second World War.

It later shifted its focus to the general financial needs of developing countries. The World Bank finances many types of economic development projects in .

Click HERE for Paper III Past Paper Questions and Responses. Topic 1: Causes, practices and effects of war assess the significance of either air power or naval power in deciding its outcome. Assess the importance of each of the following as causes of either the First World War or the Second World War: treaties; economic factors.

How much power do economic factors have in deciding the struggle for global power? To explain the outcome of WWI economic historians stress the increasingly mechanised nature of warfare, waged for years on end by massed forces.

They emphasise things like numbers of tanks, guns, ships, airplanes and. World War I was one of the defining events of the 20th century. From to conflict raged in much of the world and involved most of Europe, the United States, and much of the Middle East.

In terms of technological history, World War I is significant because it marked the debut of many new. The analysis of war may be divided into several categories. Philosophical, political, economic, technological, legal, sociological, and psychological approaches are frequently distinguished.

Feb 17,  · World War Two: How the Allies Won. The pre-war experience of economic planning and mobilisation helped the regime to run a war economy on .

World War I |